security

Yocto Hardening: Kernel and GCC Configuration

Find all of the Yocto hardening texts from here!

Would you like to make your Yocto image a tiny bit harder to hack ‘n’ crack? Of course you would. This time we’re going to be doing two things to improve its security: hardening the Linux kernel, and setting the hardening flags for GCC. The motivation for these is quite obvious. Kernel is the privileged core of the system, so it better be as hardened as possible. GCC compilation flags on the other hand affect almost every C and C++ binary and library that gets compiled into the system. As you may know, over the years we’ve gotten quite a few of them, so it’s a good idea to use any help the compiler can provide with hardening them.

On the other hand, who wouldn’t like to live a bit dangerously?

Kernel Configuration Hardening

Linux kernel is the heart of the operating system and environment. As one can guess, configuring the kernel incorrectly or enabling everything in the kernel “just in case” will in the best situation lead to suboptimal performance and/or size, and in the worst case, it’ll provide unnecessary attack surfaces. However, optimizing the configuration manually for size, speed, or safety is a massive undertaking. According to Linux from Scratch, there are almost 12,000 configuration switches in the kernel, so going through all of them isn’t really an option.

Fortunately, there are automatic kernel configuration checkers that can help guide the way. Alexander Popov’s Kernel Hardening Checker is one such tool, focusing on the safety of the kernel. It combines a few different security recommendations into one checker. The project’s README contains the list of recommendations it uses as the guideline for a safe configuration. The README also contains plenty of other useful information, like how to run the checker. Who would have guessed! For the sake of example, let’s go through the usage here as well.

Obtaining and Analyzing Kernel Hardening Information

The kernel-hardening-checker doesn’t actually only check the kernel configuration that defines the build time hardening, but it also checks the command line and sysctl parameters for boot-time and runtime hardening as well. Here’s how you can obtain the info for each of the checks:

  • Kernel configuration: in Yocto, you can usually find this from ${STAGING_KERNEL_BUILDDIR}/.config, e.g. <build>/tmp/work-shared/<machine>/kernel-build-artifacts/.config
  • Command line parameters: run cat /proc/cmdline on the system to print the command line parameters
  • Sysctl parameters: run sysctl -a on the system to print the sysctl information

Once you’ve collected all the information you want to check, you can install and run the tool in a Python virtual environment like this:

python3 -m venv venv
source venv/bin/activate
pip install git+https://github.com/a13xp0p0v/kernel-hardening-checker
kernel-hardening-checker -c <path-to-config> -l <path-to-cmdline> -s <path-to-sysctl>

Note that you don’t have to perform all the checks if you don’t want to. The command will print out the report, most likely recommending plenty of fixes. Green text is better than red text. Note that not all of the recommendations necessarily apply to your system. However, at least disabling the unused features is usually a good idea because it reduces the attack surface and (possibly) optimizes the kernel.

To generate the config fragment that contains the recommended configuration, you can use the -g flag without the input files. As the README states, the configuration flags may have performance and/or size impacts on the kernel. This is listed as recommended reading about the performance impact.

GCC Hardening

Whether you like it or not, GCC is the default compiler in Yocto builds. Well, there exists meta-clang for building with clang, and as far as I know, the support is already in quite good shape, but that’s beside the point. Yocto has had hardening flags for GCC compilation for quite some time. To check these flags, you can run the following command:

bitbake <image-name> -e | grep ^SECURITY_CFLAGS=

How the security flags get applied to the actual build flags may vary between Yocto versions. In Kirkstone, SECURITY_CFLAGS gets added to TARGET_CC_ARCH variable, which gets set to HOST_CC_ARCH, which finally gets added to CC command. HOST_CC_ARCH gets also added to CXX and CPP commands, so SECURITY_CFLAGS apply also to C++ programs. bitbake -e is your friend when trying to figure out what gets set and where.

I don’t think any other meme can capture this feeling of madness

So, in addition to checking the SECURITY_CFLAGS, you most likely want to check the CC variable as well to see that the flags actually get added to the command that gets run:

# Note that the CC variable gets exported so grep is slightly different
bitbake <image-name> -e |grep "^export CC="

The flags are defined in security_flags.inc file in Poky (link goes to Kirkstone version of the file). It also shows how to make package-specific exceptions with pn-<package-name> override. The PIE (position-independent executables) flags are perhaps worth mentioning as they’re a bit special. The compiler is built to create position-independent executables by default (seen in GCCPIE variable), so PIE flags are empty and not part of the SECURITY_CFLAGS. Only if PIE flags are not wanted, they are explicitly disabled.

Extra Flags for GCC

Are the flags defined in security_flags.inc any good? Yes, they are, but they can also be expanded a bit. GCC will most likely get in early 2024 new -fhardened flag that sets some options not present in Yocto’s security flags:

-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 (or =2 for older glibcs) 
-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS 
-ftrivial-auto-var-init=pattern 
-fPIE -pie -Wl,-z,relro,-z,now
-fstack-protector-strong
-fstack-clash-protection
-fcf-protection=full (x86 GNU/Linux only)

Lines 2, 3, and 6 are not present in the Yocto flags. Those could be added using a SECURITY_CFLAGS:append in a suitable place if so desired. I had some trouble with the trivial-auto-var-init flag though, seems like it is introduced in GCC version 12.1 while Yocto Kirkstone is still using 11 series. Most of the aforementioned flags are explained quite well in this Red Hat article. Considering there’s plenty of overlap with the SECURITY_CFLAGS and -fhardened, it may be that in future versions of Poky the security flags will contain just -fhardened (assuming that the flag actually gets implemented).

All in all, assuming you have a fairly modern version of Yocto, this GCC hardening chapter consists mostly of just checking that you have the SECURITY_CFLAGS present in CC variable and adding a few flags. Note once again that using the hardening flags has its own performance hit, so if you are writing something really time- or resource-critical you need to find a suitable balance with the hardening and optimization levels.

In Closing

While this was quite a short text, and the GCC hardening chapter mostly consisted of two grep commands and silly memes, the Linux kernel hardening work is something that actually takes a long time to complete and verify. At least my simple check for core-image-minimal with systemd enabled resulted in 136 recommendation fails and 110 passes. Fixing it would most likely take quite a bit longer than writing this text. Perhaps not all of the issues need to be fixed but deciding what’s an actual issue and what isn’t takes its own time as well. So good luck with that, and until next time!

As a reminder, if you liked this text and/or found it useful, you can find the whole Yocto hardening series from here.


The Movember blog series continues with this text! As usual, after reading this text I ask you to do something good. Good is a bit subjective, so you most likely know what’s something good that you can do. I’m going to eat a hamburger, change ventilation filters, and donate a bit to charity.

Yocto Hardening: Firewalls, Part 2: firewalld

Find all of the Yocto hardening texts from here!

People often ask me two things. The first question is “Why did you choose to write this firewall text in two parts?”. The answer to that is I actually started writing this over a year ago, the scope of the text swelled like crazy, and in the end, to get something published I chose to write the thing in two parts to have a better focus. The second question that I get asked is “Do you often have imaginary discussions with imaginary people in your head?”. To that, the answer is yes.

Comic about imaginary conversations
I prepare for daily stand-up by mentally going through conversations where I get deservedly fired because I didn’t close three tickets the previous day.

But without further ado, let’s continue where we left off in part 1. As promised, let’s take a look at another way of setting up and configuring a firewall: firewalld.

One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Configuring Kernel (Again)

To get the firewalld running we need a few more kernel configuration items enabled. How many? Well, I spent a few days trying to figure out the minimal possible configuration to run some simple firewalld commands, all without success. firewalld is not too helpful with its error messages, as it basically says “something is missing” without really specifying what that special something is.

Meme about Linux kernel modules
I’ve always liked Lionel’s ‘stash, but I feel like he’s looking extra fine in this pic.

After banging my head on a wall for a few days I attempted to enable every single Netfilter and nftables configuration item (because firewalld uses nftables), but no success. After some further searching, I found this blog post that contained a kernel configuration that had worked for the author of the blog. I combined that with my desperate efforts, and the resulting config actually worked! In the end, my full configuration fragment looked like this:

As you can see, my shotgun approach to configuration wasn’t 100% accurate because there were few NF and NFT configuration items I missed. Is everything here absolutely necessary? Most likely not. There actually are some warnings about unused config options for the Linux kernel version 5.15, but I’m afraid to touch the configuration at this point.

I spent some more time optimizing this and trying to make the “minimal config”, just to realize that I’m actually minimizing something that can’t be really minimized. The “minimal config” really depends on what your actual firewall configuration contains. After this realization, I decided that it’s better to have too much than too little, and found an inner peace. You can think that the fragment provides a starting point from which you can start to remove useless-sounding options if you feel like it.

While we’re still talking about the build side of things, remember to add the kernel-modules to your IMAGE_INSTALL as instructed in part 1. Or if you chose to go through the RRECOMMENDS route, remember to add all 36 modules to the dependencies.

Meme about saving disk space by removing kernel modules
To be fair, I’ve been in a situation where a few KBs of root file system content have made the difference between a success and a catastrophic failure.

The Hard Firewall – firewalld

Now that I’ve spent three chapters basically apologizing for my Linux config, it’s time to get to the actual firewall stuff. The “hard” way of setting up a firewall consists of setting up firewalld. This is in my opinion suitable if you have multiple interfaces with changing configurations, possibly edited by a human user, meaning that things change (and usually in a more complex direction).

firewalld is a firewall management tool designed for Linux distributions, providing a dynamic interface for network security (another sentence from ChatGPT, thank you AI overlords). Or to put it into more understandable words, it’s a front-end for nftables providing a D-Bus interface for configuring the firewall. The nice thing about firewalld is that it operates in zones & services, allowing different network interfaces to operate in different network zones with different available services, all of which can be edited run-time using D-Bus, creating mind-boggling, evolving, and Lovecraftian configurations. This is the nice thing, so you can imagine what the not-so-nice things are.

Now that we are somewhat aware of what we’re getting into, we can add firewalld to IMAGE_INSTALL:

IMAGE_INSTALL:append = " firewalld"

One thing worth noting is that firewalld is not part of the Poky repository, but it comes as a part of meta-openembedded. Most likely this is not a problem, because every project I’ve worked on has meta-openembedded, but it’s worth knowing nevertheless.

Now that everything is in place we can start hammering the firewalld to the desired shape. To edit the configuration we can use the firewall-cmd shipped with firewalld package. This firewall-cmd (among some other firewall-* tools) uses the D-Bus interface to command the firewalld, which in turn commands nftables, which finally sets the Netfilter in the kernel. This picture illustrates it all nicely:

Graph showing firewalld internal structure
The picture originates from here:
https://firewalld.org/2018/07/nftables-backend

So, about the actual configuration process: each network interface can be assigned a zone, and the zones can enable a certain set of services. Here’s a short command reference for how to add a custom zone, add a custom service, add the new service to the new zone, and set the new zone to a network interface:

# List available zones
firewall-cmd --get-zones
# These zones are also listed in /usr/lib/firewalld/zones/
# and /etc/firewalld/zones/

# Get the default zone with the following command
# (This is usually public zone)
firewall-cmd --get-default-zone

# This'll return "no zone" if nothing is set,
# meaning that the default zone will be used
firewall-cmd --get-zone-of-interface=eth0

# Create a custom zone blocking everything
firewall-cmd --permanent --new-zone=test_zone
firewall-cmd --permanent --zone=test_zone --set-target=DROP
# If permanent option is not used, changes will be lost on reload.
# This applies to pretty much all of the commands

# Reload the firewalld to make the new zone visible
firewall-cmd --reload

#List services, and add a custom service
firewall-cmd --list-services
firewall-cmd --permanent --new-service=my-custom-service
firewall-cmd --permanent --service=my-custom-service --add-port=22/tcp
firewall-cmd --reload

# Add the service to the zone
firewall-cmd --permanent --zone=test_zone --add-service=my-custom-service

# Set zone
firewall-cmd --zone=home --change-interface=eth0
# Add --permanent flag to make the change, well, permanent

You can (and should) check between the commands how the ports appear to the outside world using nmap to get a bit better grasp on how the different commands actually work. The changes are not always as immediate and intuitive as one would hope. Good rule of thumb is that if the settings survive --reload, they’re set up properly.

How does this all work with the file-based configuration and Yocto? You could create the zone and service files for your system using the firewall-cmd, install them during build time, and change the default zone in the configuration file /etc/firewalld/firewalld.conf to have the rules active by default. This is similar to nftables approach, but is a bit easier to customize for example from a graphical user interface or scripts, and doesn’t require custom start-up scripts. An example of adding some zones and services, and a patch setting the default zone, can be found in the meta-firewall-examples repo created for this blog text.

Comparison and Closing Words

So, now we have two options for firewalling. Which one should be used? Well, I’d pick nftables, use it as long as possible, and move to firewalld if it would be required later on. This is suitable when the target is quite simple and lightweight, at least at the beginning of the lifespan of a device. On the other hand, if it’s already known from the get-go that the device is going to be a full-fledged configurable router, it’d be better to pick the firewalld right off the bat.

Meme about differences of nftables and firewalld

What about iptables and ufw then? Both have bitbake recipes and can definitely be installed, and I suppose they even work. iptables is a bit of a legacy software these days, so maybe avoid that one though. It should be possible to use iptables syntax with nftables backend if that’s what you want. ufw in Yocto uses iptables by default, but it should be possible to use nftables as the backend for ufw. So as usual with the open-source projects, everything is possible with a bit of effort. And as you can guess from the amount of weasel words in this chapter, I don’t really know these two that well, I just took a quick glance at their recipes.

Note that the strength of the firewall depends also on how protected the rulesets are. If the rules are in a plaintext file that everyone can write to, it’s safe to assume that everyone will do so at some point. So give a thought to who has the access and ability to edit the rules. Also, it may be worthwhile to consider some tampering detection for the rule files, but something like that is worth a text of its own.

In closing, I hope this helped you to set up your firewall. There are plenty of ways to set it up, this two-parter provides two options. It’s important to check with external tooling that the firewall actually works as it should and there are no unwanted surprises. Depending on the type of device you want to configure you can choose the simple way or the configurable way. I’d recommend sticking to the easy solutions if they’re possible. And finally, these are just my suggestions. I don’t claim to know anything, except that I know nothing, so you should check your system’s overall security with someone who’s an actual pro.

Yocto Hardening: Firewalls, Part 1: nftables

Find all of the Yocto hardening texts from here!

The eternal task of making the Yocto Linux build an impenetrable fortress continues. Next, we’ll look into setting up a firewall two different ways: the easy way with nftables, and in the part two the easily configurable way with firewalld. I must warn you beforehand that this text contains a bit of resentment towards kernel configuration. I also used ChatGPT as a tool for writing a part of this text, but I’ll inform you of the section I asked it to write.

So yeah, firewall. The system keeping the barbarians out of our Linux empire. Also, one of the most bad-ass names for a program, at least if taken literally. Reality is a bit less exciting, turns out “firewall” is some technical construction term. In the magical world of computers, a firewall is a piece of software used to allow or deny network traffic coming in and out of a machine. It’s mighty useful for improving the overall security of the system to be able to prevent unwanted remote connections and such.

Step 0 – Configuring Kernel

The first step of installing and configuring a firewall on a Yocto image is ensuring that the kernel is configured correctly. What, do you think you can just start configuring the firewall and blocking your nefarious enemies just like that? Pfft, get out with that casual attitude (please don’t).

To get some basic traffic filtering with nftables done, we need to ensure that the Netfilter is enabled in the kernel, as well as the Netfilter support for nftables, and that some nftables modules are installed as well. It’s all a bit confusing, but to summarize: Netfilter is the kernel framework for packet filtering and nftables is the front-end for Netfilter that can be used from user space. nftables can then be built with or without modules to extend its functionality. The following kernel configuration fragment should do the trick:

Getting this config fragment working was where things got problematic for me. I thought that I’d just slap =y to everything and be done with it, no need to install and load modules. Well, the configuration process of the kernel consists of merging the defconfig, kernel features, and configuration fragments, and as it turns out, the kernel feature enabling the Netfilter overrode some parts of my config fragment, changing =y to =m. For some reason bitbake didn’t give a warning about this. I’m quite sure it used to do.

But where is this mythical Netfilter kernel feature located? The fragment above enables only nftables related things, how to get the Netfilter working? Well, Kirkstone release (3.1.27) of Poky has this line that enables the feature by default in the kernel, and the related configuration fragment looks like this. The multiple configs lead to funny situations where you try to remember the difference between CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK and CONFIG_NFT_CT and where they are defined and to what value.

Ensure that you’re also installing the kernel modules to the image by adding the following line somewhere in the image configuration:

IMAGE_INSTALL:append = " kernel-modules"

No use enabling the modules if they’re not installed, and by default nothing installs them, so they won’t get added to the final image. At least to the qemu64 core-image-minimal image they won’t be installed by default, guess if I found that out the hard way as well. If you need more fine-grained control over the modules that get installed, you can add them as a runtime recommendation to some package:

RRECOMMENDS:${PN} += "kernel-module-nf-tables kernel-module-nf-conntrack kernel-module-nft-ct ...

Most likely nftables package is the best place for this. However, I’d advise against this approach if possible, because there will be a lot of modules later on. If you choose to go down this route, the naming format of the modules is fortunately quite self-explanatory. CONFIG_NF_TABLES being built as a module generates kernel-module-nf-tables package, CONFIG_NFT_CT results in kernel-module-nft-ct being built etc, so this should be easily scriptable (although painful to maintain).

The Easy Firewall – nftables

The easy way of getting some firewalling done involves installing nftables, adding some rules to it, and loading them as a part of the start-up. This is suitable if you have a few interfaces with a simple configuration that doesn’t change often, preferably ever.

The actual first step of getting the firewall up and running is adding the nftables package to the image if you don’t have it already installed. This can be easily checked by running nft command. If it fails, add the package to the image configuration:

IMAGE_INSTALL:append = " nftables"

If you see the following types of errors when running the nft command it means that your kernel configuration is missing either nftables support (the first error) or some nftables module (the second error):

root@qemux86-64:~# nft
../../nftables-1.0.2/src/mnl.c:60: Unable to initialize Netlink socket: Protocol not supported
root@qemux86-64:~# 
root@qemux86-64:~# nft -f /tmp/test.conf
/tmp/test2:32:9-16: Error: Could not process rule: No such file or directory
        ct state vmap { established : accept, related : accept, invalid : drop } 
        ^^^^^^^^
root@qemux86-64:~# 

Quite often the firewall in Yocto is empty by default. The active rules of the firewall can be checked by running nft list ruleset command to print the current ruleset. If nothing is output, no rules are present. If something gets output, there are some rules present. Here’s a short reference of commands on how to set some basic rules and list them on the command line.

# List ruleset
nft list ruleset

# Add a table named filter for IP traffic 
nft add table inet filter

# Add an input chain that drops traffic by default
nft add chain inet filter input \{ type filter hook input priority 0 \; policy drop \}

# Add rule to allow traffic to port 22
nft add rule inet filter input tcp dport \{ 22 \} accept

# List tables and rules in a table
nft list tables
nft list table inet firewall

In addition to listing the tables and rulesets from inside the device, you should also try a black-box approach. Running nmap command against your device is a good way to check how the outside world sees your device. In this example, I have added the Dropbear SSH server to the image. Because the server is listening on port 22 and there are no rules defined in the firewall, the port is seen as open:

esa@ubuntu:~$ nmap 192.168.7.2
Starting Nmap 7.80 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2023-07-22 16:14 UTC
Nmap scan report for 192.168.7.2
Host is up (0.0024s latency).
Not shown: 999 closed ports
PORT   STATE SERVICE
22/tcp open  ssh
Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.06 seconds

The command line commands are useful for editing the configuration run-time, but for the rest of the text we’re going to focus on a file-based configuration that is set during the Yocto build. The configurations presented here are mostly based on “a simple ruleset for a server” in nftables wiki. It contains some useful extra things not presented here, like a rule for the loopback interface, differentiating between ipv4 and ipv6 traffic and logging, and I recommend checking it out.

Usually, a good way to start creating a firewall ruleset is to block everything by default, and then start poking holes as needed. To block everything, you can write a configuration file with the following content:

flush ruleset

table inet firewall {
    chain inbound {
        type filter hook input priority 0; policy drop;
    }

    chain forward {
        type filter hook forward priority 0; policy drop;
    }

    chain output {
        type filter hook output priority 0; policy drop;
    }
}

This config creates one rule table named firewall for inet traffic. The table contains three chains: inbound, forward and output. You can load the ruleset with nft -f <config_file> command. Once you’ve blocked all traffic, you can give the nmap command another go. As you can see, blocking is really effective. nmap actually considers the device to be non-existent at this point:

esa@ubuntu:~$ nmap 192.168.7.2
Starting Nmap 7.80 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2023-07-22 16:18 UTC
Note: Host seems down. If it is really up, but blocking our ping probes, try -Pn
Nmap done: 1 IP address (0 hosts up) scanned in 3.03 seconds

Trying to ping from the device itself to the outside world also fails because the output is blocked. In theory, allowing outgoing traffic is not the worst idea, usually many sample configurations actually allow it. But if you know the traffic that’s going to go out and the ports that will be used there’s in my opinion no sense allowing all of the unnecessary traffic. That’s just an attitude that will lead to botnets. But if you want/need to allow all outgoing traffic, you can just drop the output chain from the config. By default everything will be accepted.

After nothing goes in or out, it’s time to start allowing some traffic. For example, if you want to allow SSH traffic from the barbarians to port 22 (generally a Bad Idea, but for the sake of an example), you can use the following ruleset:

flush ruleset

table inet firewall {
    chain inbound {
        type filter hook input priority 0; policy drop;

        # Allow SSH on port TCP/22 for IPv4 and IPv6.
        tcp dport { 22 } accept
    }

    chain forward {
        type filter hook forward priority 0; policy drop;
    }

    chain output {
        type filter hook output priority 0; policy drop;

        # Allow established and related traffic
        ct state vmap { established : accept, related : accept, invalid : drop } 
    }
}

If you want to define multiple allowed destination ports, separate them using commas, like { 22, 80, 443 }. If you choose not to block outgoing connections, you obviously don’t need the output chain presented here.

On the other hand, if there’s a process in the Yocto image that wants to contact the outside world, you could consider adding a ruleset like below:

flush ruleset

table inet firewall {
    chain inbound {
        type filter hook input priority 0; policy drop;

        # Allow established and related traffic
        ct state vmap { established : accept, related : accept, invalid : drop } 
    }

    chain forward {
        type filter hook forward priority 0; policy drop;
    }

    chain output {
        type filter hook output priority 0; policy drop;

        # You can check the ephemeral port range of kernel 
        # from /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range
        tcp sport 32768-60999 accept
    }
}

Note how we need to use a port range for the output. Outgoing connections usually use a port from an ephemeral range for their connection, meaning that you may not know beforehand the exact port that needs to be allowed. Having fixed ports for outgoing traffic makes the device more susceptible to port scanning and prevents multiple connections from the same service because the port is already used, but if you choose to create a service that uses a static source port, you can use a single port number in the rule.

You can combine the rules in the chains as required by your system and services. If you want to enable the ping command (for ipv4), you can add the following piece of configuration to the input chain (note that this is just a single line of configuration, not a full config):

icmp type echo-request limit rate 5/second accept

In the end, creating the firewall ruleset is fairly simple: block everything and allow only necessary things. The difficulty really comes from keeping the rules up-to-date when something changes. However, when developing an embedded device with Yocto you generally should have a well-defined list of allowed ports & traffic (as opposed to a general-purpose computer used by a living human where all sorts of traffic and configs may come and go at the user’s whim). If that’s not the case, the part 2 where we work with firewalld may be useful to you.

So, now we know how to write the perfect configuration file. But how to add this to a Yocto build? You can create a bbappend file for nftables into your own meta-layer. This append then installs the configuration file, because nftables does not install any configuration by default. An example of how to add a configuration to nftables can be found in meta-firewall-examples repository I made for this blog post.

You should also note that nftables package doesn’t contain any mechanism to activate the rules during the start-up. Therefore you should append the nftables recipe so that it adds an init.d script or a service file that activates the rules from the configuration file before the networking is started. You can find an example of this as well from the same meta-firewall-examples repository.

Note that if you do run-time edits to the configuration with nft command, the changes will be lost when the device is reset. To ensure that the changes are kept, you can run the following command to overwrite the default config with the new, enhanced configuration:

nft list ruleset > /path/to/your/configuration-file

And one more thing: if you face some No such file or directory issues when trying more exotic configurations you are most likely missing some kernel configurations. In part 2, we’ll be enabling pretty much every feature of the Netfilter, so that’ll (most likely) be helpful. On that cliffhanger, we eagerly await the next chapter in this ever-evolving journey of discovery and innovation (I asked Chat-GPT to write that sentence).

Yocto Hardening: Finding & Fixing CVEs

Find all of the Yocto hardening texts from here!

Last time when we were talking about Yocto hardening we focused on setting up extra users to prevent unauthorized root access and to avoid situations where the users would have too open permission sets. Getting these right is a good low-hanging fruit, but there are plenty of other things to consider for hardening the system. One of the most important things to do is to eliminate (or at least minimize) the security vulnerabilities weakening the overall system defenses.

What are CVEs?

Despite what one may be inclined to think, open-source code is not always perfect. It may contain bugs, which is a bit annoying, but it may also contain vulnerabilities, which is potentially a bit dangerous. These can lead to denial of service attacks, data leaks, or even unauthorized accesses & system takeovers. Not good. Very bad. The usual stuff.

Panic Omg GIF - Find & Share on GIPHY

CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) is a system maintained by The United States National Cybersecurity FFRDC and operated by Mitre Corporation. The system contains information about, well, vulnerabilities and exposures. “CVE” as a noun can also mean vulnerability or exposure. Or at least I often use the acronym in with that meaning. Checking your Yocto system against this database of vulnerabilities can help to detect security issues lurking in the open-source code components.

Checking vulnerabilities in Yocto

Every CVE doesn’t necessarily lead to unauthorised root access, and there may be vulnerabilities that don’t have a CVE identifier. However, scanning through the CVEs in your system should provide a fairly good image of how vulnerable your system is against possible CVE exploits. At least at the time of the scan, there are constantly new issues popping up which means you have to keep doing it often. Also it’s good to keep in mind that this kind of a scan does not check for other kind of weaknesses in the system. But at least performing the CVE check in the Yocto system is fairly simple. Something is simple in Yocto, what?

Mood What GIF by NBC - Find & Share on GIPHY
My whole worldview is being shattered.

In all simplicity, just add this line to local.conf to check your packages & images for common vulnerabilities.

INHERIT += "cve-check"
# I had some issues with slow download speeds. If you get weird timeouts
# when fetching issue database, try adding this line as well:
CVE_SOCKET_TIMEOUT = "180"

Now when you run the build you’ll most likely end up with more warnings than before. Yocto’s CVE checker prints a warning to the build output for every vulnerability it detects, and depending on the complexity and age of your system your terminal may end up quite yellow. It’s more useful to inspect the CVE reports than to try and remember the build output as it scrolls by. These reports can be found in <build-folder>/tmp/deploy/cve folder, and we’ll inspect them a bit later. It’s worth knowing that this CVE checker may not be perfect, meaning that there may be some vulnerabilities lurking around that it does not detect. But it’s at least better than going through all the source code eyeballing it.

Analysing the results

Ok, now you’ve proved to yourself that your system has holes that need to be plugged. How to get over this uneasy feeling of constant doom looming over your system? The first thing is listing out all the CVE IDs and checking their status & severity to get a bit more stressed. Or relaxed, depends a bit on how well your system is maintained.

Sponge Bob Reaction GIF - Find & Share on GIPHY
Let’s be real, this is most likely going to be the most accurate reaction.

Further information for the CVEs can be found on MITRE’s CVE site, and some more complementary information can be found on NIST’s (National Institute of Standards and Technology) NVD (National Vulnerability Database). Plenty of acronyms. NVD is a system containing the same CVE IDs as MITRE’s site, but with severity scores and usually some extra information. Both are definitely useful, but for practical purposes NVD tends to be more useful. MITRE’s site can contain some new info not yet present in NVD, but NVD contains the information in a more easily digestible format.

Let’s take CVE-2023-22451 as an example. CVE listing for the vulnerability shows a short summary, affected versions, and a bunch of links. NVD entry has the same information, severity score, modification date, and a bit more information about the links so you won’t have to guess which link is the patch and which is some advisory (this can be useful on bigger issues where there are a dozen of links). For what it’s worth, Yocto’s CVE checker uses NVD’s database.

Now that we’ve gone through some background information, we can investigate the results of the CVE check. The aforementioned <build-folder>/tmp/deploy/cve contains two summary files: cve-summary and cve-summary.json. These contain all the detected issues, both patched and unpatched, and the format of the files isn’t all that intuitive for getting an actual summary, so I wrote a simple Python-tool for summarising the results. The design is very human:

# Replace the file path with your path
python3 ./cve-parser.py -f build/tmp/log/cve/cve-summary.json

Very easy to use. By default the parser will output the unpatched CVEs, and from each CVE it will print the package name, CVE ID, CVSS scores, and the link to the NVD site for more info. There is more information per issue available, the results can be sorted, and the ignored & patched issues can also be printed if needed. To get the complete list of options, run:

python3 ./cve-parser.py -h

I’m not going to document the whole program here in case I decide to change it at some point. If your boss asks you to get the total amount of unpatched CVEs in the system, you can run the command below to get “extra info” from the parser. Currently, “extra info” just contains the number of displayed issues, but if you’ve got ideas for it feel free to let me know:

# -u display unpatched issues (default behavior, but added just in case)
# -e displays extra info
python3 ./cve-parser.py -u -e -f build/tmp/log/cve/cve-summary.json

If your boss asks how many of them actually need to be fixed, use this to sort the CVEs by severity score and count how many have a score higher than 8.3

# -u display unpatched issues
# -ss2 sort by CVSSv2 score
python3 ./cve-parser.py -u -ss2 -f build/tmp/log/cve/cve-summary.json

Just kidding, please fix them all.

Fry Reaction GIF - Find & Share on GIPHY

Fixing the CVEs

After you’ve justified your fears of getting hacked by realizing that your system has seven CVEs with a CVSS score higher than 9.5 (three of them in the kernel) and a few dozen more with just a slightly lower priority, it’s time to ask the big question: what can I do? What can I possibly do? This didn’t help with the feeling of constant doom at all.

The first step is going through the list of unpatched issues. There tend to be quite a few false positives that are not applicable to the current system. For example, a brand new Poky build reports an unpatched CVE-2017-6264 that’s been around six years already. This is a vulnerability in the NVIDIA GPU driver, and it’s applicable to Android products. Most certainly it’s a false positive in your Yocto system, but since the bad code is present in the source code, it’s reported as unpatched. You can ignore these false positives by adding the line below somewhere to your build configuration (local.conf works, but it’s maybe not the best place for it):

# The format is CVE_CHECK_IGNORE="<cve-id>", e.g.
CVE_CHECK_IGNORE="CVE-2017-6264"
# In the older Yocto versions this was called CVE_CHECK_WHITELIST
# so if ignore doesn't work, try the old whitelist variable

After ignoring the false positives fixing the rest of the CVE issues is easy, in theory. Just keep the Yocto at its newest (or relatively new LTS) version. This should keep the packages fresh. Sounds simple, but unfortunately this process tends to cause a big headache with incompatibilities and such. However, that’s the best advice I can give.

If there is a need to update the recipes even further than officially supported, or if you want to update a single recipe, copy the recipe in question to your own meta-layer, update the recipe version in the filename and fix SRCREV to match. When hacking around like this remember to hope that nothing falls apart in the system even more than during a regular Yocto version update.

Sometimes, updating the packages is not an option. Perhaps updating the package breaks the build, a newer version of the library isn’t compatible with your application, or there is some other Perfectly Good Reason you’re not allowed to do that. That’s when it’s time to do some patching to make the confusing build system even more spaghettified.

Noodles Spaghetti GIF - Find & Share on GIPHY

Basically, this approach consists of heading to the NVD entry for the CVE, checking if there’s a patch for the vulnerability, and if there is, porting the patch to the Yocto build. For example, the aforementioned CVE-2023-22451 mentions this commit as its patch in the NVD entry. Copy the contents of the commit to a patch file, create bbappend file for the recipe and add the patch to the recipe with that bbappend.

If there’s no patch you can wait. Or if you’re like a kid on Christmas and can’t wait, you can try digging the package’s git repositories for the corrective commit before it’s been released. It ain’t fun, and rarely it’s a productive use of time, but every now and then some fixes can be found like this before they are made official.

That’s a short explanation of how you can check and fix the CVE vulnerabilities in your system. The theory of the process is fairly simple. However, it tends to get a bit more complicated in the actual world, especially when trying to update older legacy systems where the stale, non-updated packages contain more patches than original code. But I guess that’s the problem with real life, it tends to mess up good theories.

You can find the next part about Yocto hardening here. It’s about firewalls.

Yocto hardening: Non-root users, sudo configuration & disabling root

Find all of the Yocto hardening texts from here!

Cybersecurity. The never-ending race between you trying to secure your precious IoT device and some propeller head who’s finding the wildest exploits and destroying your system just in the time between breakfast and lunch (although true hackers work during night, not in the mornings). Or perhaps you forgot to update your WordPress plugins, and now your fantastic development blog is hacked. Or perhaps you’ve just been postponing that security update on your Android phone for six months. We all have some experience with cybersecurity.

Usually, there are some simple things to do to prevent the worst catastrophes. Update software, make sure the run-time environment is sane & secure, and encrypt the secrets to mention a few. In this new blog series, I try to explain how to make your Yocto systems more secure by adding some common-sense security to the system. All of these ideas are familiar from Linux desktop & server environments, but I’m going to show how to apply them to Yocto builds. So, unfortunately, I’m not actually going to cover how to keep a fantastic WordPress site secure.

Well okay, no need to be upset. Just press the red “update plugins” button every now and then. And if you’re self hosting, I wish luck to your distro upgrades.

As usual with any security advice, it’s good to be slightly skeptical when reading it. This means that some rando writing blog posts on their blog may not be a 100% trustworthy or up-to-date source on everything. Also, those randos will take no responsibility for the results of their advice. However, their advice may provide useful guidance and general tips that you can apply to your system’s security hardening plan. You do have a security plan, right?

So, the first topic of this Yocto hardening exercise is users. As you may have heard, running and doing everything as the root user is generally considered a Bad Idea. Having services running under the root user unnecessarily can result in root user executing arbitrary code using the most imaginative methods. Or, if the only user available for logging in is the root user you’re not only giving away root permissions to malicious users, but to incompetent users as well.

This text will assume intermediate knowledge of Yocto, meaning that I won’t explain every step in depth along the way. Hopefully, you know what an append-file and local.conf are. The code and config snippets were originally written for Yocto Kirkstone checked out “at some point after 4.0.3 release”, and later re-tested with version 4.0.15.

Before we get started with the actual hardening, there’s one preliminary task to do. Ensure that you don’t have DEBUG_TWEAKS in either IMAGE_FEATURES or EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES. Not only is it unsafe as it allows root login without a password, and a bunch of other debug stuff, but it also makes some examples shown here behave in unexpected ways.

Creating non-root users

Here is a code snippet that creates a service user for the system. This user can be logged in with, and they have sudo capabilities (if sudo-package is installed). Insert this code either into a image recipe or a configuration file:

# If adding to configuration file, use INHERIT += "extrausers" instead.
inherit extrausers

IMAGE_INSTALL:append = " sudo"

# This password is generated with `openssl passwd -6 password`, 
# where -6 stands for SHA-512 hashing alorithgm
# The resulting string is in format $<ALGORITHM_ID>$<SALT>$<PASSWORD_HASH>,
# the dollar signs have been escaped
# This'll allow user to login with the least secure password there is, "password" (without quotes)
PASSWD = "\$6\$vRcGS0O8nEeug1zJ\$YnRLFm/w1y/JtgGOQRTfm57c1.QVSZfbJEHzzLUAFmwcf6N72tDQ7xlsmhEF.3JdVL9iz75DVnmmtxVnNIFvp0"

# This creates a user with name serviceuser and UID 1200. 
# The password is stored in the aforementioned PASSWD variable
# and home-folder is /home/serviceuser, and the login-shell is set as sh.
# Finally, this user is added to the sudo-group.
EXTRA_USERS_PARAMS:append = "\
    useradd -u 1200 -d /home/serviceuser -s /bin/sh -p '${PASSWD}' serviceuser; \
    usermod -a -G sudo serviceuser; \
    "

The extrausers class allows creating additional users to the image. This is done simply by defining the desired commands to create & configure users in the EXTRA_USERS_PARAMS variable. As a side note, it’s good to have static UIDs for the users as this will make the builds more reproducible.

In a perfect world, every custom service you create for your system would run under a non-root user. When writing a recipe that creates a daemon or other kind of service, you can use the snippet below to add a new user in a non-image recipe:

inherit useradd
USERADD_PACKAGES = "${PN}"
GROUPADD_PARAM:${PN} = "--system systemuser"
# This creates a non-root user that cannot be logged in as
USERADD_PARAM:${PN} = "--system -s /sbin/nologin -g systemuser systemuser"

As you can see, adding a new user in a non-image recipe is slightly different than in the image recipe. This time we’re only giving parameters to useradd and groupadd commands. After adding this, you should be able to start your daemon as the systemuser in a startup script. If you need root permissions for some functionality in your service but don’t want the service to be run as root, I’d recommend reading into capabilities. It’s worth noting that when adding users in a service recipe like this, the additions are done per-package basis, not per-recipe basis. This means that you can create and add new users in a quite flexible manner.

The flexibility tends to come with some complications though…

Editing sudoers configuration

By default, when adding the sudo-package to the build it doesn’t do much. It doesn’t actually allow anything special to be done by the users, even if they are in the sudoers group. That’s why we need to edit the sudo-configuration. There are two ways of doing this, either by editing the default sudoers file or by adding drop-in sudoers.d configurations. First, editing the sudoers file (which is the worse method in my opinion).

There are two ways of doing this, and I’m not 100% sure which one is less bad, so I’ll leave it to you to decide. The first option is adding a ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND to the image recipe:

enable_sudo_group() {
    # This magic looking sed will uncomment the following line from sudoers:
    #   %sudo   ALL=(ALL:ALL) ALL
    sed -i 's/^#\s*\(%sudo\s*ALL=(ALL:ALL)\s*ALL\)/\1/'  ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}/etc/sudoers
}

ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND += "enable_sudo_group;"

The second option is creating a bbappend file for the sudo recipe, and adding something like this there:

do_install:append() {
    # Effectively the same magic sed command
    sed -i 's/^#\s*\(%sudo\s*ALL=(ALL:ALL)\s*ALL\)/\1/'  ${D}/${sysconfdir}/sudoers
}

Both do the same thing, and both are hacky. The correct choice really depends on if you want to edit the sudoers file in a different way for each image, or if you want the sudo configuration to depend on something else. You can also of course supply your own sudoers file instead of sed-editing it, and that can be a lot more maintainable way of doing this if you have more than just one change.

However, a more flexible way of configuring sudo is with the sudoers.d drop-in files. It also involves a lot fewer cryptic sed commands. Let’s assume that you have a recipe that creates a new user lsuser (not to be confused with a loser), and you want that user to have sudo rights just for ls-command (considering rights given to this user, they may actually be a loser). For this purpose you need to create a bbappend for sudo, and add something like this snippet to create a drop-in configuration:

do_install:append() {
    echo "lsuser ALL= /bin/ls " > ${D}${sysconfdir}/sudoers.d/lsuser
}

FILES_${PN} += " ${sysconfdir}/sudoers.d/lsuser"

Again, if your drop-in configuration is more complex than one line, you can provide it as a configuration file through SRC_URI and install that in your image instead of echoing configuration lines. I recommend reading sudo-configuration documentation for more info on how to precisely set the permissions because let’s be honest, these two examples aren’t the shining examples of sudo configuration.

The downside of this approach is that you need to add the drop-in configuration in a sudo bbappend because /etc/sudoers.d will conflict when creating the root filesystem if you add the drop-in in another recipe. This means that when you’re creating a user in a non-sudo recipe and add the drop-in conf in the sudo recipe you’ll have the user creation & configuration handled in two different places, which is perfect for forgetting to maintain things.

Disabling root-login

Disabling root login is useful for a multitude of reasons.

  1. You usually want to make sure that no user has the full command set available
  2. You also want that the users’ privileged actions to end up logged in auth.log when they use sudo
  3. In general, it’s “a bit of a risk” to allow users to log in as root

Disabling the root user can be achieved in multiple ways, and I’m going to cover three of them here: fully locking the root account, removing the login shell, and disabling the SSH login. In theory, locking the root account should be enough, assuming non-root users cannot unlock it, but I’ll present all the methods as they may be useful for different situations.

First, disabling the root account. This is a method I found from this StackOverflow answer, kudos there. The simple snippet below pasted in the image recipe should lock and expire the root account:

inherit extrausers
EXTRA_USERS_PARAMS:append = " usermod -L -e 1 root; "

Then, removing the login shell. Or more like setting the login shell to nologin. This isn’t strictly required after locking the root account but can be achieved by creating a bbappend shown below to base-passwd recipe:

do_install:append() {
    # What this magic sed does:
    # "In the line beginning with root
    # replace /bin/sh with /sbin/nologin
    # in file passwd.master"
    # (passwd file gets generated from this template during install)
    sed -i '/^root/ s/\/bin\/sh/\/sbin\/nologin/' ${D}${datadir}/base-passwd/passwd.master
    # sry for the picket fence

    # I think it's peak sed that I need a four line
    # comment to explain a one-liner
}

And finally, disabling the SSH login. You should always disable the root login over remote networks. If you need, you can just disable the SSH login for root and still allow other service users to log in as root. This is still a better option than doing nothing, as this will prevent logging in as root remotely and attackers would need to know two passwords to gain root access (one for the service user, and the other one for the root user).

Disabling the root login varies a bit between the SSH servers. Dropbear disables root login by default with -w parameter in DROPBEAR_EXTRA_ARGS variable located in the /etc/defaults/dropbear file (note that if you have debug-tweaks enabled, the file actually contains -B, allowing root-login). You can overwrite the file with your own dropbear.default file during the build if you want to add more options.

Similarly, OpenSSH-server disables root logins with passwords if debug-tweaks is removed from the IMAGE_FEATURES (and allows them if it’s present). This is achieved by sed-editing SSH configuration files. If you want to see how this is exactly done, check ssh_allow_root_login function in meta/classes/rootfs-postcommands.bbclass (part of poky).

However, it’s worth noting that this default behaviour doesn’t prevent public key authentication. If you want to disable that as well, you can add this function as a rootfs post-process task to the image recipe. And if needed, it could of course be modified to work in a bbappend as well.

# The function here searches sshd_config and sshd_config_readonly files for a
# commented line containing PermitRootLogin, and replaces it with "PermitRootLogin
# no" to prevent any sort of root login.

disable_rootlogin() {
    for config in sshd_config sshd_config_readonly; do
        if [ -e ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}${sysconfdir}/ssh/$config ]; then
            sed -i 's/^[#[:space:]]*PermitRootLogin.*/PermitRootLogin no/' ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}${sysconfdir}/ssh/$config
        fi
    done
}

ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND += "disable_rootlogin;"

The thing to note about disabling root login is that too lenient sudo- or filesystem-permissions for non-root users can make the whole thing useless. For example, if a service user has sudo access to passwd command they can easily unlock the root account. If a service user has write permissions to /etc they can set the root’s login shell and edit SSH configuration. And finally, disabling root login like shown in this text does nothing to prevent shell escapes made possible by incorrectly set sudo-permissions.

Might as well roll out the red carpet

That’s it for this time! Hopefully, these tips helped you to achieve the minimum security in your Yocto images. Do these code snippets make your system unhackable? Not even close. Do they make it slightly more inconvenient? I hope so (but no guarantees for that either). But at least now you can show your Yocto image to an independent professional security consultant and say that you tried before they tear the whole system to pieces.

You can find the second part of the Yocto hardening series here. It’s about fixing CVEs.